Minimalism

 

“When you see a gruesome picture over and over again, it really doesn’t have any effect.”  (Andy Warhol)

 

“With the black paintings, I was interested in creating a kind of work that couldn’t be ‘read’.”  (Frank Stella)

 

“Simplicity of form does not necessarily equate to simplicity of experience.”  (Robert Morris)

 

“I am not interested in hidden structures.  All the cards are on the table.”  (Steve Reich)

 

 

Political Background

                                                                

Signified vs. Signifier – Minimalism vs. The Post-Modern – Surface vs. Depth

 

Malevich vs. Duchamp or Cage vs. Schoenberg  or Form vs. Content

 

Rose, “A B C Art”  (1965)

 

275          For, although superficially Malevich and Duchamp may appear to represent the polarities of Twentieth-century art--that is, on the one hand, the search for the transcendent, universal, absolute, and on the other, the blanket denial of the existence of absolute values--the two have more in common than one might suppose at first. 

 

277               Both the yearnings of Malevich’s Slavic soul and the deductions of Duchamp’s rationalist mind led both men ultimately to rejet and exclude from their work many of the most cherished premises of western art in favor of an art stripped to its bare, irreducible minimum.

 

It is important to keep in mind that both Duchamp’s and Malevich’s decisions were renunciations—on Duchamp’s part, of the notion of the uniqueness of the art object and its differentiation from common objects, and on Malevich’s part, a renunciation of the notion that art must be complex.  That the art of our youngest artists resembles theirs in its severe, reduced simplicity, or in its frequent kinship to the world of things, must be taken as some sort of validation of the Russian’s and the Frenchman’s prophetic reactions.

 

“Interpretation is the revenge of the intellect on art.”  (Susan Sontag)

 

The new sensibility – Erotics of art

 

                Advanced Art = Potty Trained (you are able to wait for gratification)

 

“The inexorable reductive ness of minimalism may represent the final stage of the dehumanization of art…”  (Strickland)

 

 

MINIMALISM – Music of the Signified

 

Began between 1958 and 1973 (depends on your orientation.)  Some consider Vexations by Satie as the first minimalist piece; however, that predates the societal changes that define minimalism’s importance.

 

Stockhausen, Berio, and Boulez were portraying in very honest terms what it was like to pick up the pieces of a bombed-out continent after WWII.  But for some Americans in 1948 or 1958 or 1968 – in the real context of tail-fins, Chuck Berry and millions of burgers sold – to pretend that instead we are going to have the dark-brown angst of Vienna is a lie, a musical lie.  (Steve Reich 1987)

 

“In its simplest definition, Minimalism is a style distinguished by severity of means, clarity of form, and simplicity of structure and texture.”  (Strickland)

 

The principle features of the minimalist technique include… a continuous formal structure, an even rhythmic texture and bright tone, a simple harmonic pallet, a lack of extended melody lines, and repetitive rhythmic patterns.  (Tim Johnson)

 

The process is the piece vs. The Medium is the Message  (McLuhan reference)

 

!

 
La Monte Young

 


Fascinated by the concept of the audience as a social situation.

 

Young was involved with many “happenings.”  Schwartz’s description of one:

 

The breaking point seems to have come with 2 Sounds of April 1960.  In one realization, Young dragged a gong across the floor, while Riley rammed a garbage can against a wall.  This time the audience began to curse loudly; some listeners, in an oddly mis-directed act of self-defense, began to sing the Star Spangled Banner.  It was a happening that Cage himself would have loved.

 

Young – “the theater of the singular event” vs. Cage – multiple events [Young “minimalized” Cage]

 

La Monte Young’s Piano Piece for David Tudor #1 Bring a bale of hay and a bucket of water onto the stage for the piano to eat and drink.  He performer may then feed the piano or leave it to eat by itself.  If the former, the piece is over after the piano has been fed.  If the latter, the piece is over after the piano eats or decides not to.

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Composition 1960 #7  [Notated B & F#]  “to be held for a very long time”

 

 

Steve Reich

 

As a matter of fact, most of the following “Non-Western” techniques may derive as much from Reich’s youthful jazz studies as from his African Journey; it is often difficult to decide where popular influence ends and non-Western influence begins.[1]

 

Reich       ...in a sense, I’m not as concerned that one hears how the music was made as I was in the past.  If some people hear exactly what’s going on, good for them, and if other people don’t, but they still like the piece, then that’s OK too. 

 

Reich insists that this chordal suspension technique was derived from studying the second Movement of Bartok’s Piano Concerto No. 2 (1931); in other words, it is a method he learned purely by looking at Western sources.  “For me, it’s a major breakthrough because it (Variations)  deals with a harmonic language implicit in many pieces but never really developed, and unless I had gone back to some traditional Western sources, I probably would not have developed it myself.”[2]



[1] Schwarz, K. Robert. “Steve Reich: Music as a Gradual Process, II”  Perspectives in New Music.  XX/1-2 (1981-82): 225-86.

 

[2] Ibid.